表现
RD 熱度指數
RD 增長指數
| 1h | 24h | 7d | 30d | 60d | 90d |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.12% | 6.27% | 8.08% | 35.50% | 18.08% | 713.79% |
收入和銷毀
協議收入
$23.02K回購資金
--銷毀資金
--回購率
--協議資金趨勢
月度金額與比值
| 週期 | 協議收入 | 回購資金 | 銷毀資金 | 回購率 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11 | $23.02K | -- | -- | -- |
| 2026-10 | $96.51K | -- | -- | -- |
| 2026-09 | $163.3K | -- | -- | -- |
| 2026-08 | $171.2K | -- | -- | -- |
| 2026-07 | $198.99K | -- | -- | -- |
| 2026-06 | $116.38K | -- | -- | -- |
比較
跟隨更新
跟隨列表
人物
關於MetaDAO
MetaDAO 是一個建立在 Solana 上的治理協議，於 2023 年 11 月推出。其核心創新在於以「未來預測治理」取代傳統的代幣投票，這是一種透過條件預測市場來做出決策的機制。針對每個提案，會建立兩個市場：一個預測提案通過後的代幣價格，另一個預測提案失敗後的價格。交易者以真實資金進行押注，價格較高的結果即為最終決策。這使得治理與實際代幣價值掛鉤，而非空洞的投票。 該協議還營運著 Futardio，這是一個無需許可的所有權代幣發行平台。專案方設定使命、最低募資額及每月預算，隨後進行為期四天的公開銷售，所有參與者均以相同的美國穩定幣價格參與。沒有私募輪次或內部人士折扣。近期發行的專案均出現大幅超額認購，例如 $CARS 在最低募資額 25 萬美元的情況下，收到了超過 3100 萬美元的認購承諾。 MetaDAO 解決的主要問題是傳統 DAO 中的治理冷漠與激勵錯位——投票率低且大戶主導。透過要求投票者為自己的意見投入資金，強化了問責機制。 在過去六個月（2026 年 3 月至 9 月），MetaDAO 獲得了顯著的發展動能。多個精選 ICO 成功完成，且所有代幣交易價格均高於發行價，其中 $CRED 以 89% 的回報率領先。Futardio 平台有超過 2000 名配置者參與，在各項 ICO 中貢獻了超過 4000 萬美元。$META 代幣在 30 天內上漲了 39%，主要受惠於活動增加以及 7 月底至 8 月初在 Upbit 和 Bithumb 的上架，這使得交易量提升了約 50%。 然而，風險依然存在。該代幣沒有硬性供應上限，依賴決策市場來防止稀釋，若市場深度不足，此機制可能失效。此外，近期的價格飆升很大程度上反映了交易所上架事件，而非基本面變化，且發行平台的成功高度依賴於多頭市場情緒。
MetaDAO 於 2023 年 11 月在 Solana 上線，透過空投分發 META 代幣，成為首個在主網上實施 Robin Hanson 的 futarchy 治理協議：由決策市場而非投票來決定提案。2024 年 5 月，它推出「Futarchy as a Service」，允許 Jito、Drift 等外部 DAO 使用其決策市場，將治理模式從單一專案擴展為生態系統工具。 2025 年 4 月，它推出基於 futarchy 的募資啟動平台，首創所有權代幣 ICO。到 2026 年，已有八個專案籌集約 2,560 萬美元，其設計具備不可 rug 的特性——募得資金進入金庫，支出需經市場批准。在此期間，它從 Paradigm、Variant、6MV 等機構獲得 990 萬美元；Solomon Labs 透過 MetaDAO 公開募資籌得 1 億美元，成為標誌性案例。市場降溫後，其首個失敗的 ICO 出現，顯示該模式開始面臨週期性考驗。 2026 年，META 在 Coinbase、Upbit 及 Bithumb 上市，標誌其獲主流交易所接納。
Exchanges and events: META rose about 27% after its Coinbase listing in May; listings on Upbit and Bithumb from late July to early August lifted volume about 50%, and the token gained about 39% in 30 days (to early September); the inaugural Owners Meeting on July 10 pitched the ownership-coins concept.
Launchpad business: Futardio completed several public sales (CRED, Rip Cars and others, all trading above issue price); $CARS drew over $31 million in commitments against a $250,000 minimum; Solomon Labs raised $100 million through a MetaDAO public offering.
Revenue and mechanics: the 0.5% Futarchy AMM trade fee goes entirely to the protocol since December 22, 2025; revenue fell from about $1.8 million in Q4 2025 to about $556,000 in Q1 2026 and a low of $67,000 in March, recovering to $199,000 in July, with a protocol treasury of about $9.95 million. META has no scheduled unlocks and governance is executed through decision markets; the first failed ICO appeared as the market cooled, and participation in most decision markets remains thin.
MetaDAO is a fundraising and governance platform built on futarchy (prediction-market governance) on Solana, reaching scale in 2026. During the year it launched an on-chain treasury model: all USDC raised in a token sale goes into a governed treasury, the team draws only on a preset monthly budget, and any excess requires a governance proposal validated by conditional prediction markets; about 20% of funds is paired with tokens into an AMM and 80% is controlled by token-holder votes for buybacks, revenue distribution and the like.
Progress and metrics: the platform has facilitated over $100 million in cumulative fundraising (Umbra raised $3 million in 2026), with net assets above $11 million and quarterly revenue in the hundreds of thousands of dollars (including a 25-basis-point fee on AMM volume). On June 20 ZKFG-008 passed, executing the first on-chain take-private. A Galaxy Digital report noted that via prediction-market validation MetaDAO has enabled 62 futarchy votes across 9 DAOs, with Jito, Marinade and Sanctum testing the model.
MetaDAO's focus this year has moved from raising money to exit mechanics: ZKFG-008 completed the first onchain take-private with a pass price of $0.1614 against a fail price of $0.1545, and the $647,450 of volume was the market pricing the deal's value rather than shareholders casting votes. The point is that futarchy stops being a governance experiment and becomes an M&A instrument — control of an onchain entity is decided by a price spread rather than a headcount, with a $0.15 redemption, an escrow window and IP transfer all written as executable instructions. The friction is just as real: Zinc refused a buyout it saw as cheap against $57.8 million of annualised revenue, showing how hard decision markets find it to force a founder out while the target still generates cash. Whether the structure repeats across more cases decides if MetaDAO is an onchain bank or just a launch platform.
MetaDAO（Solana生態系統預測市場治理項目）核心團隊： Proph3t（創始人）：匿名開發者，曾是以太坊DeFi核心貢獻者及Web2軟體工程師。因對DAO與企業政治感到失望，他於2022年開始探索更優治理模式，最終創立MetaDAO以推動「市場制定決策」的預測市場理念。 Kollan House（聯合創始人，Twitter：@metanallok）：具備工程與專案管理背景，現任MetaDAO聯合創始人及Toa Capital Partners的DeFi主管。曾啟動多個加密項目，包括Sentries（Solana驗證節點/NFT），專注於運用預測市場改善治理與ICO流程。